<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cashing in on Real Estate</title>
	<atom:link href="http://udothedishes.com/2009/10/cashing-in-on-real-estate/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://udothedishes.com/2009/10/cashing-in-on-real-estate/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 19:54:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: C-Philly</title>
		<link>http://udothedishes.com/2009/10/cashing-in-on-real-estate/comment-page-1/#comment-4075</link>
		<dc:creator>C-Philly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 17:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://udothedishes.com/?p=9446#comment-4075</guid>
		<description>The program I was talking about with the 3% down conventional is with a lender I work with at Wells Fargo.  I’m not sure if all lenders know about this because it is so new (it was rolled out only a few weeks ago) but the one I work with has already done a lot with the program.  The best part about it is that there is no mortgage insurance.   Let me know if you want more information.  I can send you his information.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The program I was talking about with the 3% down conventional is with a lender I work with at Wells Fargo.  I’m not sure if all lenders know about this because it is so new (it was rolled out only a few weeks ago) but the one I work with has already done a lot with the program.  The best part about it is that there is no mortgage insurance.   Let me know if you want more information.  I can send you his information.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://udothedishes.com/2009/10/cashing-in-on-real-estate/comment-page-1/#comment-4074</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:31:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://udothedishes.com/?p=9446#comment-4074</guid>
		<description>Also, I have never seen a conventional program before that offers a 3% down payment. Where is this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, I have never seen a conventional program before that offers a 3% down payment. Where is this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://udothedishes.com/2009/10/cashing-in-on-real-estate/comment-page-1/#comment-4072</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:23:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://udothedishes.com/?p=9446#comment-4072</guid>
		<description>C-Philly, good article. Keep the input coming. 

I do my homework asking questions about the flow of the market all the time since it constantly changes. Yes, I was referring to flexibility in terms of credit scores. Everyone should be aware that the credit score is your make or break factor in terms of qualifying for a specific loan. I believe mine is upwards of 770 something; last I checked earlier this year. 

And yes, you are right, some convnetional programs do still require PMI, but most I have looked into for myself do not; which is why people stress putting 20% down as the safe preferred down payment method when buying a home. Who wants additional costs if you can avoid them long term?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>C-Philly, good article. Keep the input coming. </p>
<p>I do my homework asking questions about the flow of the market all the time since it constantly changes. Yes, I was referring to flexibility in terms of credit scores. Everyone should be aware that the credit score is your make or break factor in terms of qualifying for a specific loan. I believe mine is upwards of 770 something; last I checked earlier this year. </p>
<p>And yes, you are right, some convnetional programs do still require PMI, but most I have looked into for myself do not; which is why people stress putting 20% down as the safe preferred down payment method when buying a home. Who wants additional costs if you can avoid them long term?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C-Philly</title>
		<link>http://udothedishes.com/2009/10/cashing-in-on-real-estate/comment-page-1/#comment-4071</link>
		<dc:creator>C-Philly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 14:56:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://udothedishes.com/?p=9446#comment-4071</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the input Dave!  Unfortunately, banks are always changing their lending guidelines.  This was mostly correct this past summer.  Now, with all of the competition that banks are having with each other, that is not totally true anymore.  It actually comes down to credit scores, debt-to-income ratios and the size of your down payment.  I know of at least one conventional loan program that only requires 3% as a down payment.  

When you say more &quot;flexible&quot;, I&#039;m assuming that you are referring to credit scores.  Yes, usually FHA loans require a 620 credit score, where MOST conventional programs (not all) require a credit score of 720.  This is because an FHA loan is 100% backed by the government, so banks are more inclined to lend them to people with lower credit score (viewed as &quot;higher risk&quot;) because they know they will get their money back.

Keep in mind, however, that some conventional programs do actually require mortgage insurance.  Usually if your loan is greater than 80% of your loan-to-value (basically, if you put less than 20% down) you will still have private mortgage insurance costs.  This usually runs about a couple hundred dollars per month.  

Another consideration about an FHA loan is that it is assumable.  This means that when you go to sell your houses 5, 10, 15 years from now, someone can actually take over your loan.  So if the interest rates when you&#039;re selling in 2013, 2019 or 2023 are at somerthing crazy like 15%, you can not only sell your house, but you can offer your buyer to take over your mortgage, which is at 6%.  This is another reason which makes FHA attractive.

Dave, your concluding statement is mostly correct.  If you want to put a larger down payment then you obviously have more options then if you want to put a smaller down payment.  However, it is no longer black and white that FHA will always be a lower down payment than conventional.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the input Dave!  Unfortunately, banks are always changing their lending guidelines.  This was mostly correct this past summer.  Now, with all of the competition that banks are having with each other, that is not totally true anymore.  It actually comes down to credit scores, debt-to-income ratios and the size of your down payment.  I know of at least one conventional loan program that only requires 3% as a down payment.  </p>
<p>When you say more &#8220;flexible&#8221;, I&#8217;m assuming that you are referring to credit scores.  Yes, usually FHA loans require a 620 credit score, where MOST conventional programs (not all) require a credit score of 720.  This is because an FHA loan is 100% backed by the government, so banks are more inclined to lend them to people with lower credit score (viewed as &#8220;higher risk&#8221;) because they know they will get their money back.</p>
<p>Keep in mind, however, that some conventional programs do actually require mortgage insurance.  Usually if your loan is greater than 80% of your loan-to-value (basically, if you put less than 20% down) you will still have private mortgage insurance costs.  This usually runs about a couple hundred dollars per month.  </p>
<p>Another consideration about an FHA loan is that it is assumable.  This means that when you go to sell your houses 5, 10, 15 years from now, someone can actually take over your loan.  So if the interest rates when you&#8217;re selling in 2013, 2019 or 2023 are at somerthing crazy like 15%, you can not only sell your house, but you can offer your buyer to take over your mortgage, which is at 6%.  This is another reason which makes FHA attractive.</p>
<p>Dave, your concluding statement is mostly correct.  If you want to put a larger down payment then you obviously have more options then if you want to put a smaller down payment.  However, it is no longer black and white that FHA will always be a lower down payment than conventional.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://udothedishes.com/2009/10/cashing-in-on-real-estate/comment-page-1/#comment-4069</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 14:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://udothedishes.com/?p=9446#comment-4069</guid>
		<description>Blake, it really comes down to a few things, but overall, it is how much money you are putting down.

Each loan will generally have the same interest rates. However, FHA provides putting a lower down payment at only 3.5-5% compared to a Conventional loan that would require a larger down payment of 10-20%. Basically, FHA provides more flexibility in qualifying. Conventional loans though would not require PMI (private mortgage insurance) costs. 

It really comes down to your decision of if you want to put down a larger down payment or not. If you do put down a large down payment, you&#039;ll have a lower overall mortgage payment in the long term. You put down a smaller down payment, and you&#039;ll have a larger overall mortgage in the long term.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blake, it really comes down to a few things, but overall, it is how much money you are putting down.</p>
<p>Each loan will generally have the same interest rates. However, FHA provides putting a lower down payment at only 3.5-5% compared to a Conventional loan that would require a larger down payment of 10-20%. Basically, FHA provides more flexibility in qualifying. Conventional loans though would not require PMI (private mortgage insurance) costs. </p>
<p>It really comes down to your decision of if you want to put down a larger down payment or not. If you do put down a large down payment, you&#8217;ll have a lower overall mortgage payment in the long term. You put down a smaller down payment, and you&#8217;ll have a larger overall mortgage in the long term.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blake the Megalomaniac</title>
		<link>http://udothedishes.com/2009/10/cashing-in-on-real-estate/comment-page-1/#comment-4066</link>
		<dc:creator>Blake the Megalomaniac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://udothedishes.com/?p=9446#comment-4066</guid>
		<description>What are the advantages to doing FHA as opposed to conventional, if any?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are the advantages to doing FHA as opposed to conventional, if any?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->